Ask Question
19 November, 21:44

Stanley and Steinhardt accuse the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of hindering what type of privacy for Americans?

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 19 November, 22:07
    0
    Financial privacy

    Explanation:

    Stanley and Steinhardt allege that the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act did the opposite of what it intended to, protect Americans' financial privacy, by authenticating the consummation of financial information by financial companies.

    The Safeguards Rule of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires financial institutions to develop and maintain a security plan to protect the confidentiality and integrity of personal information. According to Stanley and steinhardts the Act did the opposite, that is, hindering Americans financial privacy
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Stanley and Steinhardt accuse the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of hindering what type of privacy for Americans? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers