Ask Question
8 March, 08:34

Which Supreme Court case found the use of grandfather clauses unconstitutional?

+5
Answers (2)
  1. 8 March, 08:40
    0
    A grandfather clause (or grandfather policy) is a provision in which an old rule continues to apply to some existing situations while a new rule will apply to all future cases. Those exempt from the new rule are said to have grandfather rights or acquired rights, or to have been grandfathered in. Frequently, the exemption is limited; it may extend for a set time, or it may be lost under certain circumstances.

    The Supreme Court case found the use of grandfather clauses unconstitutional, is the Guinn v. United States, 238 U. S. 347 (1915).
  2. 8 March, 08:47
    0
    The Supreme Court case that found the use of the grandfather clause unconstitutional is the Guinn v. United States, 238 U. S. 347 (1915). In its decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the grandfather clause exemptions to literacy tests were unconstitutional. It declared the grandfather clauses as repugnant to the Fifteenth Amendment and therefore null and void.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which Supreme Court case found the use of grandfather clauses unconstitutional? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers