Which of the following explains the decision in the Sacco and Vanzetti Trial?

The American public's aggressive pushes for a guilty verdict poisoned the jury.

The judge was able to hand down a just verdict despite Red Scare hysteria.

The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict.

The two men were rightly convicted for their acts of wrongdoing.

Question

Nataly Ingram

History

19 September, 20:26

Which of the following explains the decision in the Sacco and Vanzetti Trial?

The American public's aggressive pushes for a guilty verdict poisoned the jury.

The judge was able to hand down a just verdict despite Red Scare hysteria.

The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict.

The two men were rightly convicted for their acts of wrongdoing.

+5

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Hamza Barr · Answer 1

The answer is " The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict". Civil liberty was not given to these two men who were forced to speak out their political opinions. Anti-radical movements had rallied on because they believed that these Italian merchants were innocent and were framed from such accusation.

Meredith Mcbride · Answer 2

The anti-immigrant sentiments of the time swayed the judge and led to a guilty verdict