Which of the following might have kept people living in rural areas rather than relocating to the mid-century cities?

a/voting power within the state

b/better transportation

c/increased job opportunities

d/new business development

Better transport is the logical explanation for rural people instead of moving to mid-century metropolises.

Explanation:

In a large city, living expenses are greater than remote costs. Although there is some reality to these declarations, sure, there are many more opportunities in areas in which the population is twice as high, and you'll pay for that incentive in more ways than just one.

There are six factors that staying in a desirable area might be a cheaper option than you assume:

Spare half or more of cost of housing Take advantage of lower land rent and utilities For all, you will pay less. You've got room to stretch out Minimal price of housing makes it much easier to take risks In fact, if you really want, you can easily travel