Ask Question
27 December, 06:41

Select the results of the Dred Scott decision.

Dred Scott remained a slave.

The fugitive-slave law was declared unconstitutional.

A slave was ruled to be a noncitizen with no right to sue in federal court.

Freeing a slave against a master's wishes was ruled to be a violation of due process of law.

The Missouri Compromise was declared unconstitutional.

Proslavery people were alarmed.

The U. S. Constitution appeared to support slavery.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 27 December, 07:03
    0
    Dred Scott decision, formally Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford, legal case in which the U. S. Supreme Court on March 6, 1857, ruled (7-2) that a slave (Dred Scott) who had resided in a free state and territory (where slavery was prohibited) was not thereby entitled to his freedom; that African Americans were not and could never be citizens of the United States; and that the Missouri Compromise (1820),
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Select the results of the Dred Scott decision. Dred Scott remained a slave. The fugitive-slave law was declared unconstitutional. A slave ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers