18. One way in which the Supreme Court decisions in Mapp v. Ohio (1961), Gideon v.

Wainwright (1963), and Miranda v. Arizona (1966) are similar is that each resulted in

(1) more legal searches without warrants

(2) fewer gun control regulations

(3) additional limitations on religious freedom

(4) expanded rights for people accused of crimes

To Mirandize someone means that while you are arresting someone, you make them aware of their rights. Mirandize has become part of the English language. That's what Miranda v Arizona accomplished.

Mapp v. Ohio established that there is no breaking the 4th amendment. Evidence that was not collected by due process can't be used in a court of law.

Gideon v. Wainwright makes it the state's responsibility to provide a lawyer for those unable to afford one.

All of these are intended to expand the rights of those accused of crimes.