Ask Question
19 April, 01:14

When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?

O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions

O B. When it is written by an academic professional

O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event

directly

O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 19 April, 01:36
    0
    A

    Explanation:

    Ommiting information is a sign of unreliability as it manipulates what readers see and can create false conclusions.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions O B. When it is ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers