When would a secondary source be considered unreliable?
O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions
O B. When it is written by an academic professional
O C. When it is written by someone who did not experience an event
directly
O D. When it offers a theory about the significance of an event
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “When would a secondary source be considered unreliable? O A. When it omits information that contradicts its conclusions O B. When it is ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which came first neolithic or paleolithic
Answers (2)
Wwi identify and explain contributions made by american citizens during world war i successes and limitations made to the american war effort
Answers (1)
True or False: An economy is defined as the production and distribution of goods and services in a particular geographic region or country
Answers (1)
How did industrialisation affect Europe after renaissance
Answers (2)
Are there any poisonous animals in Washington State?
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
How did many native americans react to changes to their homeland?
Answers (1)
Why would the slavers feed and clean the slaves before the slaves were put on an auction block?
Answers (1)
How did the Trauma Doctrine further Cold War development?
Answers (1)
How did Great Britain react to the proclamation of American neutrality in 1793? They seized American merchant ships. They protected American trade ships. They increased trade with America. They stopped all trade with America.
Answers (1)
What British law Required American colonist to house British troops
Answers (1)