Which of the following described the typical economic cost of imperial rule?
A. It cost a lot to run a colony because labor and resources had to be imported.
B. It cost very little to run a colony as local resources and labor were abundant. C. The high cost of paying for a military occupation came from local colonial taxes. D. The low cost of military occupation benefited local colonists and encouraged emigration from Europe.
Answers (2)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which of the following described the typical economic cost of imperial rule? A. It cost a lot to run a colony because labor and resources ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
How did the Espionage and Sedition Acts contradict the First Amendment?
Answers (1)
What posed the greatest challenge to pioneers crossing the western mountains?
Answers (2)
Identify and Explain the Following: 7. Result of Peace of Westphalia on German-Speaking lands 8. Reason for Dutch and English alliance against France 9.
Answers (1)
During World War II, the US and Soviet Union were allies. After the War the two countries came into conflict. What were the causes of this conflict? How did the two countries view each other?
Answers (2)
Women's suffrage in Arizona was granted by which reform measure? an initiative a recall a referendum a direct primary
Answers (2)
New Questions in History
Answer personal law vocab answer
Answers (1)
What is extreme pride in ones own nation called?
Answers (1)
France most economically successful colony in the American was
Answers (1)
Which of the following choices best describes the purpose of the Sugar Act? The British wanted to allow the colonists to pay lower taxes on sugar. The British wanted the colonies to contribute more to the costs of defending their territory.
Answers (2)
Which political process is necessary for redistricing
Answers (1)