Ask Question
18 February, 22:06

Which two arguments did the Supreme Court use to uphold the constitutionality of korematsu's internment

+4
Answers (2)
  1. 18 February, 22:10
    0
    A. Due to the war, there was not enough time to hold trials or hearings before sending people to internment camps.

    B. The military had a legitimate need to protect against espionage and sabotage
  2. 18 February, 22:35
    0
    The two principal arguments that the court take into account in favor of korematsu in his case against the United States are that Korematsu was in fact an American citizen, and that he did not committed any crime but living in America during World War II. Korematsu did not relocate when the order was given because he was born in the United States, while their parents that attended the relocation were born in Japan.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which two arguments did the Supreme Court use to uphold the constitutionality of korematsu's internment ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers