In morales v. chicago, the u. s. supreme court held that the city's anti-gang ordinance was unconstitutional because it

Question

Mckenna

History

1 September, 02:02

In morales v. chicago, the u. s. supreme court held that the city's anti-gang ordinance was unconstitutional because it

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Myles Blevins · Answer 1

For the main reason that it was not furthermore stated in the constitution, the u. s. supreme court that held that the city's anti-gang was considered to be unconstitutional. In addition, a policy or act could be considered as a "constitutional" one if it is not in accordance to the United States book of laws.