Which of the following is the BEST explanation for government regulation of the public utilities market? The isolated location makes it impossible for any other providers of utilities to compete. It is most efficient to allow only one supplier of electricity or water because of economies of scale. Providing utilities is not attractive to private companies because of limited opportunities to make a profit. The government wishes to reward the technological innovation of the utilities providers with guarantees of limited competition.

The best explanation for government regulation of the public utility market is:

The government wishes to reward the technological innovation of the utility providers with guarantees of limited competition.

The government regulates the public utility market because the sources used are a basic need for population, such as water and electricity, and should be in the public government control. As the company which works with that specific source, not the government, is investing in technological innovation, it is offered to them a limited competition as an incentive to keep the investment in technological innovation to offer to the population better services.

The best explanation for "government regulation" of the public utility market is: "The government wishes to reward the technological innovation of the utility providers with guarantees of limited competition".

Explanation:

The government need be at the focus on regulating utilities belonging to the state while in the market. This is because the resources that are used are basic needs for people. Therefore, it should also regulate its use.

As a company that deals with the specific resources, the government should also monitor the technological innovation by offering them little competition on incentives. This is important to ensure the population receives the best services.