Ask Question
29 August, 18:04

Which of these statements best explain why the decision made in the deed Scott case nullified the compromise of 1850 and "popular sovereignty"

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 29 August, 18:12
    0
    The U. S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.

    In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master's widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which of these statements best explain why the decision made in the deed Scott case nullified the compromise of 1850 and "popular ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers