Match each case with the precedent it established.
Mapp v. Ohio
Officers can gather evidence that is in
plain view
Horton v. California
Officers can legally carry out a stop and
frisk
Terry v. Ohio
Convictions cannot be based on
evidence from an illegal search.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Match each case with the precedent it established. Mapp v. Ohio Officers can gather evidence that is in plain view Horton v. California ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
Which group did navists specifically target as threats to "American culture"?
Answers (1)
God's provision of Jesus as the Lamb slain for our sins shows His: 1) justice 2) mercy 3) omnipresence
Answers (1)
Africa still feels the effects of colonization today. Why?
Answers (1)
Which of the following describes how Marcus Aurelius affected the Roman Empire? A) He demonstrated tolerance towards all religions. B) He built many roads and waterways. C) He gave land to soldiers who fought for Rome.
Answers (2)
What were the main dispute of the indigenous people of Palestine?
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Which was a result of the construction of the Transcontinental Railroad? Hard-working Chinese tracklayers were treated with new respect by their supervisors The railroad opened new markets for trade, and spurred the creation of time zones.
Answers (2)
Who is the Appeaser?
Answers (1)
One state's 1832 Ordinance of Nullification was passed
Answers (1)
What impact did the Battle of Waterloo have on the world? A) The defeat of Napoleon promoted nationalism in Italy and the unification of the territory. B) France's territorial control regressed, renewing interest in a single European government.
Answers (1)
Under the rule of Chandra Gupta II, the government was considered fair and just, bringing peace and stability to the region. True or false
Answers (1)