The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police
may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.
must never, even with reasonable cause, carry out a stop and frisk.
must always have a warrant to seize evidence, even if it is in plain view.
may never violate the Fourth Amendment protections concerning searches and seizures.
Answers (1)
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police may, in certain cases, ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers
You Might be Interested in
What most fundamentally aided the spread of enlightenment from Europe to America?
Answers (1)
What is the place of worship called for a muslim
Answers (1)
Which of the following roles did Great Britain's colonies play in causing the Industrial revolution
Answers (1)
How did the failure of Germany's schlieffen plan to quickly defeat France affect the future course of the war?
Answers (2)
Americans feared the Communists because they were a. known as Bolsheviks. b. the only political party in Russia. c. openly hostile to American values. d. preparing to invade the United States.
Answers (1)
New Questions in History
Islam is a religion that proselytizes (attempt to convert followers). What are some other religions which do this?
Answers (1)
The North American regions listed above are all part of which biome? A. forest B. desert C. marine D. tundra
Answers (1)
List three details of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Then give two reasons some U. S. senators opposed this treaty.
Answers (1)
According to Christian beliefs, Peter is the ... main apostle of Jesus betrayer of Jesus persecutor of Christians leading Christian scholar
Answers (1)
How did renaissance art depict human forms?
Answers (1)