Ask Question
26 July, 01:19

Which of these statements is true regarding the use of testimony on hair samples in courts today?

(A) Hair samples are replacing DNA as an easily available, go-to source for identifying suspects.

(B) Modern changes in the discipline mean that any police officer can provide testimony on hair samples.

(C) Hair samples are necessary for most convictions.

(D) There's solid research that should lead us to be skeptical of testimony based on hair samples.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 26 July, 01:30
    0
    Answer: I would say A

    Explanation:

    Due to the simple fact that a hair simple contains DNA

    Also, It couldn't be B because it is not a form of discipline

    Where In the option of C it is not necessary for a conviction

    Answer choice D; a hair sample is not going to lead to skeptical testimony because it is not testimonial evidence.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which of these statements is true regarding the use of testimony on hair samples in courts today? (A) Hair samples are replacing DNA as an ...” in 📗 Law if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers