The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the defendant by both that state's courts and the federal trial court within that state.

True/False

Question

Ariana Walters

Law

6 October, 23:04

The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the defendant by both that state's courts and the federal trial court within that state.

True/False

+5

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Siena Mueller · Answer 1

True

Explanation:

The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state meets the required minimum contacts prerequisites and establishes personal jurisdiction.

The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the defendant by both that state's courts and the federal trial court within that state.True/False

The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the defendant by both that state's courts and the federal trial court within that state.

True/False