Ask Question
30 October, 15:33

When looking at the rational function f of x equals the quantity x minus one times the quantity x plus two times the quantity x plus four all divided by the quantity x plus one times the quantity x minus two times the quantity x minus four, Bella and Edward have two different thoughts. Bella says that the function is defined at x = - 1, x = 2, and x = 4. Edward says that the function is undefined at those x values. Who is correct? Justify your reasoning.

+4
Answers (1)
  1. 30 October, 15:40
    0
    F (x) = [ (x-1) (x+2) (x+4) ] / [ (x+1) (x-2) (x-4) ]

    The function shows discontinuity at those values of x as the denominator becomes 0; therefore, Edward is correct.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “When looking at the rational function f of x equals the quantity x minus one times the quantity x plus two times the quantity x plus four ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers