Ask Question
31 July, 11:16

A professional sports organization is going to implement a test for steroids. The test gives a positive reaction in 94% of the people who have taken the steroid. However, it erroneously gives a positive reaction in 4% of the people who have not taken the steroid. What is the probability of Type I and Type II errors giving the null hypothesis "the individual has not taken steroids.

a. Type I: 4%, Type II: 6%

b. Type I: 6%, Type II: 4%

c. Type I: 94%, Type II: 4%

d. Type I: 4%, Type II: 94%

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 31 July, 11:24
    0
    Type I: 4%, Type II: 6%

    Step-by-step explanation:

    given null hypothesis

    H0=the individual has not taken steroids.

    type 1 error-falsely rejecting the null hypothesis

    ⇒ actually the null hypothesis is true⇒the individual has not taken steroids.

    but we rejected it ⇒our prediction is the individual has taken steroids.

    typr II error - not rejecting null hypothesis when it has to be rejected

    ⇒actually null hypothesis is false ⇒the individual has taken steroids.

    but we didnt reject⇒the individual has not taken steroids.

    let us denote

    the individual has taken steroids by 1

    the individual has not taken steroids. by 0

    predicted

    1 0

    actual 1 94% 6%

    0 4% 96%

    so for type 1 error

    actual-0

    predicted-1

    therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 4%

    so for type II error

    actual-1

    predicted-0

    therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 6%
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A professional sports organization is going to implement a test for steroids. The test gives a positive reaction in 94% of the people who ...” in 📗 Mathematics if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers