How does an indirect proof differ from a regular proof?

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

Regular proof is a method of proving the statement directly.

In this method, we just proved it by using direct formula or theorem.

whereas,

Indirect proof is a way of proving by contradiction.

In this method we assume first that the given statement is false, then it is proved correct by contradiction.

Regular proof is all about known facts that is for e. g X must be true, while in indirect proof you assume X is true