A biologist is researching antibodies, which are tiny natural proteins in the blood of animals, and she is using methods developed twenty years ago. These methods allow her to study the antibodies even though they are very small, approximately 10-9 m in size. The biologist tells her friend, who is a physicist, that she is now a nanotechnologist. Her friend disagrees. Why does the physicist disagree?

Question

Frankie Abbott

Physics

12 November, 18:14

A biologist is researching antibodies, which are tiny natural proteins in the blood of animals, and she is using methods developed twenty years ago. These methods allow her to study the antibodies even though they are very small, approximately 10-9 m in size. The biologist tells her friend, who is a physicist, that she is now a nanotechnologist. Her friend disagrees. Why does the physicist disagree?

+4

Answers (2)

Know the Answer?

Kenzie Smith · Answer 1

B. The biologist is not working with nanotechnology.

Explanation:

I got it right on edge.

Kaitlin Brady · Answer 2

Her friend disagrees because the biologist is not working with nanotechnology which would enable her to be a nanotechnologist.

The biologist is only working with nano antibodies.