Suppose a utilitarian abolitionist argues that the death penalty is too costly to implement in a democratic society. a plausible nonconsequentialist reply is that

Question

Hank

Social Studies

15 September, 23:15

Suppose a utilitarian abolitionist argues that the death penalty is too costly to implement in a democratic society. a plausible nonconsequentialist reply is that

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Louie · Answer 1

Non-Consequentialist answers contend that intercessions are unjustified for reasons having nothing to do with their outcomes. So we can say that the answer would be based on the problem is that the death penalty is a just punishment, then the costs involved do not matter.