Ask Question
30 September, 03:00

A scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on a. inconsistent data. b. independent data. c. unlimited results. d. controlled results.

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 30 September, 03:03
    0
    I would say independent results as there is no proof ans usually other scientists test each other hypothesis's and invalid does not mean wrong it means not true, so inconsistent results are true but perhaps inaccurate, so it would be B
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on a. inconsistent data. b. independent ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers