Why are approach-approach conflicts likely to create cognitive dissonance? Group of answer choices These conflicts create inertia, thus past habits are employed without the need to resolve the cognitive inconsistencies These conflicts result when the positive alternative simply overwhelms the negative, thus no cognitive dissonance exists under the condition These conflicts result when both alternatives are positive. The selection of one requires the rejection of another, which creates a need for a cognitive explanation of why one positive choice was not selected. These conflicts are very confusing to resolve intellectually.

Question

Kaylie Chambers

Social Studies

15 November, 02:57

Why are approach-approach conflicts likely to create cognitive dissonance? Group of answer choices These conflicts create inertia, thus past habits are employed without the need to resolve the cognitive inconsistencies These conflicts result when the positive alternative simply overwhelms the negative, thus no cognitive dissonance exists under the condition These conflicts result when both alternatives are positive. The selection of one requires the rejection of another, which creates a need for a cognitive explanation of why one positive choice was not selected. These conflicts are very confusing to resolve intellectually.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Zoey Cook · Answer 1

These conflicts result when both alternatives are positive. The selection of one requires the rejection of another, which creates a need for a cognitive explanation of why one positive choice was not selected.

Explanation:

Approach-approach conflicts arises because of the presence of positive alternatives in which only one must be chosen.

cognitive dissonance theory refers to a situation where by there is a conflict in attitudes and beliefs of individuals over the harmonization of their individual beliefs, behaviors and attitude over an event or group of events, it is natural for people to seek stability in their everyday approach towards certain issues and circumstances and the unwillingness to change that even if the alternative is as good as the former.