Anti-Federalists argued that

branches of government would keep each other in balance.

it was impossible to separate government into equal branches.

the Constitution would create a Republican government.

a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

Question

Farrell

Social Studies

10 February, 17:12

Anti-Federalists argued that

branches of government would keep each other in balance.

it was impossible to separate government into equal branches.

the Constitution would create a Republican government.

a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Kale Summers · Answer 1

branches of government would keep each other in balance.

Explanation:

Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution because they claimed stronger government undermined state sovereignty. They feared that a strong central government would restrict individual rights and liberties and therefore proposed to divide the power of government. They further emphasized that checks and balances and the division of powers will protect people from a strong central government.

Anti-Federalists argued thatbranches of government would keep each other in balance.it was impossible to separate government into equal branches.the Constitution would create a Republican government.a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.

Anti-Federalists argued that

branches of government would keep each other in balance.

it was impossible to separate government into equal branches.

the Constitution would create a Republican government.

a Republic should protect people from the government and from each other.