Marilyn brought her $300 silk dress to University Dry Cleaners to be cleaned. On the back of the ticket she received in exchange for the dress was written, "Liability limited to ten times the cost of cleaning." Marilyn's dress was lost and University now claims it owes her only $56.50, ten times the cost of cleaning. Is that true?

Question 7 options:

No, because the limitation is unconscionable.

No, because the cleaners is not a common carrier.

No, because Marilyn is not a bailor.

No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.

Question

Guest

Social Studies

10 April, 23:31

Marilyn brought her $300 silk dress to University Dry Cleaners to be cleaned. On the back of the ticket she received in exchange for the dress was written, "Liability limited to ten times the cost of cleaning." Marilyn's dress was lost and University now claims it owes her only $56.50, ten times the cost of cleaning. Is that true?

Question 7 options:

No, because the limitation is unconscionable.

No, because the cleaners is not a common carrier.

No, because Marilyn is not a bailor.

No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.

+3

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Gabriella Decker · Answer 1

No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is not true because the limitation was not communicated to her. Since she walked into a store and asked to have her dress cleaned, the individual at the front desk should have explicitly mentioned the pricing and policy to her so that she knew what she was accepting by leaving her dress at the store. Since they did not do this then they must pay her the $300 that the dress is worth.