Ask Question
28 July, 03:23

Bruce had a disagreement with a new federal agency set up to give additional funds for college to individuals with an aptitude for math. After a hearing, the agency determined that Bruce had no aptitude for math and that he would not receive any funding. Bruce, however, was not discouraged. He told his friend Laura, who just graduated from law school, that he would simply appeal the decision to federal court, have the judge do a fresh review, and provide additional information to the judge regarding his math aptitude that the agency did not have. He feels certain that he will win at the federal court level. Refer to Fact Pattern 6-1. What should Laura tell Bruce regarding his plan to provide additional evidence to the federal court judge? a. That he will only be allowed to present additional test scores for additional judicial review. b. That his plan is a good one and that the judge will consider the additional evidence. buad 5355 test 1

+1
Answers (1)
  1. 28 July, 03:39
    0
    The correct answer is : That judicial review will likely be confined to the record compiled before the agency

    Explanation:

    To analyze if the decision made by the government was constitutional, the court has all the power to check the whole evidence. This power of the courts is to evaluate and examine the actions of the legislative, executive, and administrative arms of the government in order to see if the actions are or were consistent and according to the National Constitution.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Bruce had a disagreement with a new federal agency set up to give additional funds for college to individuals with an aptitude for math. ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers