Ask Question

Which statement best explains why secondary sources are important to historians?

A. They provide firsthand accounts of historical events

B. They put historical events in the correct chronological order

C. They summarize conclusions about primary sources

D. They are the least biased source available for any subject

+2
Answers (2)
  1. 25 May, 00:20
    0
    C. They summarize conclusions about primary sources would be the best option, because these sources differ from primary sources in that they are not first-hand accounts.
  2. 25 May, 00:22
    0
    The answer is C as it is not firsthand, they can be bias and don't put events in chronological order
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which statement best explains why secondary sources are important to historians? A. They provide firsthand accounts of historical events B. ...” in 📗 Social Studies if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers