Ask Question
15 March, 03:20

A scientist discovers a unicellular organism when examining a pond sample under a microscope. Which of the following explanations would provide a correct claim with supporting evidence to determine to which kingdom the organism would belong?

Claim: The organism is a protist.

Evidence: The organism is unicellular, prokaryotic, and lives in a moist environment.

Claim: The organism is a protist.

Evidence: The organism is multicellular, eukaryotic, and reproduces by binary fission

Claim: The organism is a bacteria cell.

Evidence: The organism is unicellular, eukaryotic, and is found in a moist environment.

Claim: The organism is a bacteria cell.

Evidence: The organism is unicellular, prokaryotic, and reproduces by binary fission.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 15 March, 03:37
    0
    Claim: The organism is a bacterial cell.

    Evidence: The organism is unicellular, prokaryotic, and reproduces by binary fission.

    Explanation:

    The organism cannot be a protist based on the evidence. Protists are unicelluar, eukaryotic, and live in a moist environment. Binary fission is the primary way that prokaryotic cells reproduce, so that does not apply to protists.

    The organism is a bacterial cell, but bacterial cells are prokaryotic, not eukaryotic. They can be found in moist environments but that is not a defining factor of bacteria, like it is for protists. Bacterial cells are unicellular.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A scientist discovers a unicellular organism when examining a pond sample under a microscope. Which of the following explanations would ...” in 📗 Biology if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers