Ask Question
22 January, 01:22

A contractor used dynamite to loosen a rocky hillside. The blast from the dynamite caused a house foundation to crack. The house was located over a half-mile away from the dynamite site. The contractor was careful when using the dynamite and no allegation of negligence is made. However, the house owner claims the contractor is liable for damage to the foundation. Is the house owner correct? Explain.

+5
Answers (1)
  1. 22 January, 01:25
    0
    Answer and explanation:

    The house owner is correct because strict liability applies in the case. Strict liability refers to the responsibility an individual or organization has over actions incurred even if there was no intention of causing property or personal injuries. Strict liability only considers if the action was the result of the damage.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “A contractor used dynamite to loosen a rocky hillside. The blast from the dynamite caused a house foundation to crack. The house was ...” in 📗 Business if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers