During the 1925 Scopes trial, the prosecution's main argument was that

Darwin's theory of evolution was not scientific.

Darwin's theory of evolution was scientific.

schools had to teach biblical creationism.

evolution should be taught along with creation.

Question

Damian Bauer

History

16 January, 01:28

During the 1925 Scopes trial, the prosecution's main argument was that

Darwin's theory of evolution was not scientific.

Darwin's theory of evolution was scientific.

schools had to teach biblical creationism.

evolution should be taught along with creation.

+1

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Babbles · Answer 1

The correct answer is C. schools had to teach Biblical creationism. It was practically illegal to teach something other than that God created the universe and everything that exists in it. So it was impossible to study Darwin at the time because he claimed that evolution existed, meaning that humans evolved from other forms of life, which obviously differed from Biblical creationism.

During the 1925 Scopes trial, the prosecution's main argument was thatDarwin's theory of evolution was not scientific.Darwin's theory of evolution was scientific.schools had to teach biblical creationism.evolution should be taught along with creation.

During the 1925 Scopes trial, the prosecution's main argument was that

Darwin's theory of evolution was not scientific.

Darwin's theory of evolution was scientific.

schools had to teach biblical creationism.

evolution should be taught along with creation.