Ask Question
22 April, 08:55

Which best describes why the sizes of farms in New England were different from farms in the southern colonies?

a) In New England, the soil was rich, the land was flat, and the growing season was long, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies.

b) In New England, the soil was poor, the land was hilly, and the growing season was short, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

c) In New England, the soil was rich, the land was covered in forests, and the growing season was short, so the farms were bigger than in the southern colonies.

d) In New England, the soil was poor, the rivers were distant, and the growing season was long, so the farms were smaller than in the southern colonies.

+3
Answers (1)
  1. 22 April, 09:01
    0
    B. The soil wasn't very good planting soil so they fished and built ships instead.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Which best describes why the sizes of farms in New England were different from farms in the southern colonies? a) In New England, the soil ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers