The Florida Supreme Court decides the case of Metro Convention Center, Inc. v. Urban Sports Team LLC. Of the nine justices, six believe the judgment should be in Metroâ€™s favor. Justice Rubio, one of the six, writes a separate opinion. The three justices who beÂlieve the judgment should be in Urbanâ€™s favor join in a third separate opinion. The opinÂion joined by the three justices who favor Urban is known as aA. concurring opinion. B. dissenting opinion. C. per curiam opinion. D. majority opinion.

Question

Ethan Hanson

Social Studies

19 May, 08:59

The Florida Supreme Court decides the case of Metro Convention Center, Inc. v. Urban Sports Team LLC. Of the nine justices, six believe the judgment should be in Metroâ€™s favor. Justice Rubio, one of the six, writes a separate opinion. The three justices who beÂlieve the judgment should be in Urbanâ€™s favor join in a third separate opinion. The opinÂion joined by the three justices who favor Urban is known as aA. concurring opinion. B. dissenting opinion. C. per curiam opinion. D. majority opinion.

+2

Answers (1)

Know the Answer?

Mitchell Fuller · Answer 1

The opinion joined by the three justices who favor urban is known as concurring opinion because it is agreed by two or more judges.

Explanation:

concurring opinion: is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more Judges of a court which agrees with the decision of the majority.