Ask Question
30 July, 16:54

Why did Texas suffer less from the war than other areas of the South?

+2
Answers (1)
  1. 30 July, 17:20
    0
    In the Civil War, Texas (young Texas) served as a support state, and there was barely any skrimishes in the state. Technically, by the governor's word (The governor at the time was Sam Houston), Texas was originally pro-Union, but the citizens wantes war as a way to assert the state's rights. Also, Texas did not fight for wealthy plantation owners in other states; Texas didn't have any cotton plantations compared to the other Southern states, so they didn't suffer as bad as a loss than the other states. Moreover, during the battles outside of the state, the Texan soldiers either deserted from warfare or joined the Union.
Know the Answer?
Not Sure About the Answer?
Find an answer to your question 👍 “Why did Texas suffer less from the war than other areas of the South? ...” in 📗 History if the answers seem to be not correct or there’s no answer. Try a smart search to find answers to similar questions.
Search for Other Answers